Primary MSN here
service004@mmopawn.com
service008@mmopawn.com
service009@mmopawn.com
service010@mmopawn.com
buyffxigil@hotmail.com
guildwars@mmopawn.com
AIM:
buyffxigil
yahoo ID:
ld8757@yahoo.com
We noticed that someone used a similar msn cheating our customers rencently (like: buyffxigill@hotmail.com double L before @)(like: buyffxlgil@hotmail.com)
Apart from the contact ways listed on our website, plz do not trust anyone else.
NewsThat s right. As wonderful as many players thought those faction-specific armor sets were, they were actually somewhat homogenous in that classes that shared the same armor type (i.e., cloth, leather, plate) had the same models. Apparently this is Blizzard s philosophy with armor set design: either the class sets are faction-neutral but look distinct from each other or they are faction-specific but look the same across armor class. The only time Blizzard broke from tradition was with the much-maligned Sunwell Plateau gear which was both faction-neutral and shared a look across armor class. It felt lazy.
When Blizzard announced that the new Tier 9 sets with Patch 3.2 would be faction-specific, I m sure I wasn t the only one who thought how awesome that would be. It would mark the first time tier sets would be themed to a faction. It was something many players had been asking for. But as the saying goes, "be careful what you wish for..." In this case, players such as myself are actually going to see the return of faction-specific armor except that there s one niggling detail we d forgotten about the first faction-specific gear sets (Level 60 PvP) -- they were armor class-based.



![<{$link[sec].title}>](http://www.mmopawn.com/images/link1.jpg)
![<{$link[sec].title}>](http://www.mmopawn.com/images/rpg.jpg)




